Difference between revisions of "Talk:Habitat"

From OCE Space Simulation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Because it is Awesome.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Awesome}}
 +
 
==Organization==
 
==Organization==
 
This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - [[User:Darth Wombat|Darth Wombat]] 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
 
This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - [[User:Darth Wombat|Darth Wombat]] 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:30, 14 September 2010

This article is designated as awesome-level on the Quality Scale.

This article is low priority for being edited. Please take care when making edits to this page to ensure its quality.



Organization

This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - Darth Wombat 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

I rather dislike the description of various systems, instead of {{main|blahblah. That would clean it up a huge amount. And maybe split up description into Hawkings I, II, and III. ---Q-Cumber 08:23, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

See main article Simulation: habitat

Where is this supposed to link to? --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:52, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

No clue. I thought that it would be nice to have a seperate page for the habitat within the confines of the simulation :P--Foo1 17:57, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
Have you created a Simulation: namespace? --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 18:45, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
No clue what that is...don;t bet on it XD--Foo1 22:18, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)

Just Hab---BenzyneTalk Page 11:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)

Dissemination of Information

There is too much concentrated tangential information and not enough information about the Hab alpha and beta reality. Communication especially is overly represented. ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 15:53, 9 April 2010 (EDT)