Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Habitat Systems"
From OCE Space Simulation
Cslatlantis (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? [[User:Cslatlantis|---<font color="red">Wernstrum</font>, <font color="#0099CC">Stargakat</font>, <font color="green">Jonas</font>]] 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? [[User:Cslatlantis|---<font color="red">Wernstrum</font>, <font color="#0099CC">Stargakat</font>, <font color="green">Jonas</font>]] 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | I think both Engineering and Environmental. The beauty of multiple categories ;)---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 08:19, 31 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:19, 31 March 2010
Project Status
Status: Work:
- See Category:Habitat Systems for list of articles under construction.
- Articles needing to be addressed
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--Foo1 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
- Yes This is another vote. --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
- How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--Foo1 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT) I think both Engineering and Environmental. The beauty of multiple categories ;)---BenzyneTalk Page 08:19, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
