Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quality Scale"
From OCE Space Simulation
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT) | ::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::"Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 14 September 2010
Feedback Please
I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Also, I know that the current templates only add the TALK PAGES to the categories; this way most people will not see the behind the scenes stuff. And it's so completely obvious which Talk page goes with which article; it would take an ardipithecus to screw that up. ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 15:14, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Cool story, bro. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- "Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Cool story, bro. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
