Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010 Proposal to Change the Hierarchy"

Revision as of 14:05, 13 September 2010

Yaouh, I aplaud this.. fancy.. stuff.. Uhm, about the criticism, perhaps the positions' responsibilities could be merged whenever insufficient people can be found to fill them; the main, most important positions need a tenant, but otherwise this hierarchy could be considered a guide, simply outlining what needs to be done and could be reworked every year depending on the situation, member-wise, of OCESS. ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 10:45, 15 April 2010 (EDT)

Yeah. Since we have no authority over future club heads of OCESS they can pretty much do what they want with it (they can chuck the whole thing out the window like we're doing), so it's sort of implied that each year you can do what you want. But yeah, it's a good point that not every position needs to be filled by a responsible, active member; however, the club will of course be healthiest when it has a full hierarchy. - Darth Wombat 17:47, 15 April 2010 (EDT)

Hm. Obviously.. you got issues when you lack members.. ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 17:17, 16 April 2010 (EDT)

Archivemaster

Did we make up the archivemaster position during or after making the proposal? IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 13:10, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

After. It was kinda a consolation prize for Mendes. ---RAEGMACHINE500^{Talk Page} 15:05, 13 September 2010 (EDT)