Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quality Scale"
From OCE Space Simulation
m |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT) | ::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT) | :::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::::So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? [[User:Patrickpowns|Patrickpowns]] 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::::::What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>[[user:Q-Cumber|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::::::Exist in the form of template:wip? or is there another template that I am painfully unaware of? [[User:Patrickpowns|Patrickpowns]] 08:14, 14 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::::::::See [[Template:meh|<nowiki>{{meh}}</nowiki>]], [[Template:rubbish|<nowiki>{{rubbish}}</nowiki>]], and [[Template:awesome|<nowiki>{{awesome}}</nowiki>]]. They just haven't been implemented on a large scale yet :( >>>[[user:Q-Cumber|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 13:18, 14 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:18, 14 October 2011
Feedback Please
I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Also, I know that the current templates only add the TALK PAGES to the categories; this way most people will not see the behind the scenes stuff. And it's so completely obvious which Talk page goes with which article; it would take an ardipithecus to screw that up. ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 15:14, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Cool story, bro. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- "Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
- So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? Patrickpowns 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)
- What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>Q-Cumber 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
- Exist in the form of template:wip? or is there another template that I am painfully unaware of? Patrickpowns 08:14, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
- See {{meh}}, {{rubbish}}, and {{awesome}}. They just haven't been implemented on a large scale yet :( >>>Q-Cumber 13:18, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
- Exist in the form of template:wip? or is there another template that I am painfully unaware of? Patrickpowns 08:14, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
- What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>Q-Cumber 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
- So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? Patrickpowns 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)
- Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
- No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- "Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---RAEGMACHINE500Talk Page 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
- Cool story, bro. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
