Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Members"

Revision as of 18:51, 22 March 2010

TODO: Maybe shove the lists into tables with the columns "Member" and "Username" or something of the sort. Non-wiki-users can be listed as N/A. I don't know how to do that but I don't really like the cluttered look it has right now =/. ---Clayton

Corrected case of mistaken identity. - Darth Wombat 22:59, 29 January 2010 (EST)

I like the system of this page, if you edit the wiki you'll find this page and add your self - it sorts out the hard workers from the not so. IronyFail 18:00, 06 February 2010 (EST)

Alphabetization

Let's alphabetize them in each section. The sorting by links was a good idea, but may appear biased towards frequent wiki-users.---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 23:05, 18 February 2010 (EST)

Let me clarify that: alphabetical by last name ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 23:09, 18 February 2010 (EST)

Well done, good man. - Darth Wombat 23:50, 18 February 2010 (EST)

And user pages too! Now we just have to extrapolate beyond my time *digs through office archive* - also, did you notice that Maclean and Daisy each have three accounts? XD ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 23:59, 18 February 2010 (EST)

Membership

Maybe at todays meeting you can clarify some of these members and make sure the right names are there / make sure they are still part of Sim. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 10:58, 19 February 2010 (EST)

James Wood

I am going to add every name from James Wood's email. EVERY NAME. It will make this page massive, as it ought to be, but in preparation for this I am going to reverse the chronology, so that we are adding new members to the top rather than to the bottom. I don't mean to imply that newer members are more important than older members, but our organization on this page gets better as the years get higher and a much higher proportion of the newer members have member biographies and well-updated pages than the older members, and I don`t want someone to take one look at this page, see a massive line of redlinks, and leave. - Darth Wombat 02:56, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

A. PLEASE SIGN.

B. I'm going to put in subheadings for exchanges and OCESS

C. Nice job on the reversal, it's nice. ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 11:25, 5 March 2010 (EST)

Sorry, I don't frequently forget to sign... - Darth Wombat 02:56, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

Alumni

There are plenty of alumni not on this page. Check ANYONE mentioned in a year or mission page, and here's the User list to find alumni not mentioned or to link alumni with their wiki accounts. Thank you ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 16:00, 5 March 2010 (EST)

And I'm adding users from yearbooks! I acknowledge that this will add people who may have only shown up for one or two meetings, but it's better to have people who weren't really members than to miss people who were. This page will be big - Darth Wombat 02:57, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

I was doing the same. And now, due to size, I'm going to move the ISSS ones to a separate page. ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 10:43, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

You beat me to it, badass.//Compliment---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 16:50, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

Redlinks

663 CHARACTERS OF REDLINKS, as well as the removal of 2 names (that's why it's an odd number). - Darth Wombat 17:20, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

I would prefer the redlinks stay on this article, now that we have the capacity to create them. Let's see what Ben has to say. ---Q-Cumber 08:15, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

Year Classification

it goes all the way back to 1999 and suddenly it says "before 2004"?? ---Wernstrum, Spartakat, Jonas 18:51, 22 March 2010 (EDT)