Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ida and Dactyl 2003"

From OCE Space Simulation
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: I think this should be combined with 2002-03. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe th...)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
 
I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
:Or someone should go find the information to fill in enough so that the pages contain different stuff >_>; I agree for the years that we generally know nothing about, the mission page should be merged into the year page, but the IDEAL set up still is that the mission page for the mission, the year page for the year, and both would contain significant amounts of information. Oh and by the way, how come there is no other ppl editing the wikis these days?--[[User:Anthony|Anthony]] 16:03, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:03, 21 October 2008

I think this should be combined with 2002-03. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Or someone should go find the information to fill in enough so that the pages contain different stuff >_>; I agree for the years that we generally know nothing about, the mission page should be merged into the year page, but the IDEAL set up still is that the mission page for the mission, the year page for the year, and both would contain significant amounts of information. Oh and by the way, how come there is no other ppl editing the wikis these days?--Anthony 16:03, 21 October 2008 (EDT)