Difference between revisions of "Talk:Engineering Commander"
From OCE Space Simulation
(Thanks Stefan) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Is this better? [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | :Is this better? [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | ::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::No problem. This article still needs some clarification as to exactly what the Engineering Commander was responsible for and what prompted the position's creation. These are things that I do not know. [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 14:13, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 19 April 2010
This page seems as though it is making fun of the position instead of saying what it does. This should be changed so it actually has content rather then it just making fun of the position. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 13:19, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- Is this better? -- Stefanido 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- Much better, thank you. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- No problem. This article still needs some clarification as to exactly what the Engineering Commander was responsible for and what prompted the position's creation. These are things that I do not know. -- Stefanido 14:13, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- Much better, thank you. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
