Difference between revisions of "Talk:Able Crewmen"
From OCE Space Simulation
(Foo! PAY ATTENTION!) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. [[User:Stefanido|Stefanido]] 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST) | I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. [[User:Stefanido|Stefanido]] 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST) | ||
| − | Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there... | + | :Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there ----Alex Foo |
| + | |||
| + | ::First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this. | ||
Revision as of 23:21, 6 April 2006
I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. Stefanido 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST)
- Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there ----Alex Foo
- First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this.
