Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Habitat Systems"
From OCE Space Simulation
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:::How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT) | :::How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? [[User:Cslatlantis|---<font color="red">Wernstrum</font>, <font color="#0099CC">Stargakat</font>, <font color="green">Jonas</font>]] 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I think both Engineering and Environmental. The beauty of multiple categories ;)---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 08:19, 31 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:22, 19 April 2010
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--Foo1 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
- Yes This is another vote. --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
- How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--Foo1 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
