Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Habitat Systems"

From OCE Space Simulation
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
**[[Engineering]] ([[Power Grid Software]])
 
**[[Engineering]] ([[Power Grid Software]])
  
 +
Proposals:
 +
;Scientific equipment be removed from Habitat Systems.
 +
:Rationale: Scientific Equipment is equipment and not a system. [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 12:46, 12 April 2010 (EDT)
 
----
 
----
  

Revision as of 12:46, 12 April 2010

Project Status

Status: Work:

Proposals:

Scientific equipment be removed from Habitat Systems.
Rationale: Scientific Equipment is equipment and not a system. -- Stefanido 12:46, 12 April 2010 (EDT)


I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--Foo1 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)

Yes This is another vote. --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--Foo1 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT) I think both Engineering and Environmental. The beauty of multiple categories ;)---BenzyneTalk Page 08:19, 31 March 2010 (EDT)