Talk:Habitat

Organization

This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - Darth Wombat 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

I rather dislike the description of various systems, instead of {{main|blahblah. That would clean it up a huge amount. And maybe split up description into Hawkings I, II, and III. ---Q-Cumber 08:23, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

See main article Simulation: habitat

Where is this supposed to link to? --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:52, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

No clue. I thought that it would be nice to have a seperate page for the habitat within the confines of the simulation :P--Foo1 17:57, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

Have you created a Simulation: namespace? --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 18:45, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

No clue what that is...don;t bet on it XD--Foo1 22:18, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)

Just Hab---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 11:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)

Dissemination of Information

There is too much concentrated tangential information and not enough information about the Hab alpha and beta reality. Communication especially is overly represented. ---RAEGMACHINE500^{Talk Page} 15:53, 9 April 2010 (EDT)

Awesome Rating

I'm redacting the awesome rating, because even though the article is in-depth and the subject material is indeed awesome, it is organized absolutely HORRIBLY. There is so much material on that page that belongs elsewhere. That bloated article really needs to be streamlined. ---RAEGMACHINE500^{Talk Page} 20:34, 14 September 2010 (EDT)