Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hull Plating"

Revision as of 08:54, 11 April 2006

Has this been accepted as Canon? It is written here as if it is, but I'm under the impression it is still be debated. - Avacar 11:55, 7 April 2006 (EDT)

If we only put stuff that is accepted as Canon on this, then no work will ever get done. This is a work in progress, and it is on this, the discussion page, that debates concerning the content of the Hull plating article should take place. If you still do not approve, bear in mind that I, as leader of the Pseudoscience taskforce and Wikimaster, have given permission for descriptions that have not yet been officialized to be posted here. Stefanido 13:28, 8 April 2006 (EDT)

I believe that my previous comment removes the need for an alumni displeasure warning on this article. I will, however, leave it on until an alumnus has had time to review it.Stefanido 13:30, 8 April 2006 (EDT)

I thought it would be a good start...if someone else has another idea we could add it and present both of them as competing proposals on how to armour the hab. --Foo1 23:45, 8 April 2006 (EDT)

Perhaps if you are going to put "works in progress" on the site, then a template stating it as such would also work? Something like 'This article is currently under modification'. This should especially be true for things like Pseudoscience. You have to keep in mind that when you guys change this stuff, you aren't just changing it for you, but for all future 'Simmies too. Ablative armour just isn't a practical solution for the Habitat or the AYSE drive... - Avacar 12:17, 10 April 2006 (EDT)

Wondefull...and how would we give this a lable of "work in progress"? --Foo1 16:02, 10 April 2006 (EDT)

You need to make a template. See the {{pseudoscience}} and {{Alumni-review}} templates for examples. This one should probably be {{Work-In-Progress}}. If I get bored at work later today, I might do it for you. - Avacar 09:54, 11 April 2006 (EDT)