Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Habitat Systems"

From OCE Space Simulation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==Project Status==
 
−
'''Status:''' Moderate Progress
 
−
 
−
'''Work:'''<br>
 
−
*See [[:Category:Habitat Systems]] for list of articles under construction.
 
−
*Add <nowiki>{{Systems}}</nowiki> at the top of all new Habitat Systems pages.
 
−
*Articles needing to be addressed
 
−
**[[Radiation Shields]]
 
−
**[[Navigation]]     
 
−
**[[Power Bus]]
 
−
**[[Engineering]] ([[Power Grid Software]])
 
−
 
−
'''Proposals:'''<br>
 
−
:No Proposals
 
−
 
−
'''Implemented Proposals:'''<br>
 
−
:;Scientific equipment be removed from Habitat Systems.
 
−
:Rationale: Scientific Equipment is equipment and not a system. [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 12:46, 12 April 2010 (EDT)
 
−
::'''Agree'''---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 18:22, 13 April 2010 (EDT)
 
−
:::'''Implemented''' [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 14:19, 14 April 2010 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
'''Template:'''<br>
 
−
We're using the template <nowiki>{{Systems}}</nowiki> (no parameters) to denote Habitat Systems pages. This links back to the [[Habitat Systems]] page. Once the wiki is upgraded to the latest software, the wrench icon itself will link to the page. Until then, the text "HS" will accomplish that task.
 
−
 
−
----
 
−
 
−
 
 
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
 
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
 
: '''Yes''' This is another vote. --[[User:TheKillerRabbit|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="#0099CC">Killer</font> <font color="red">Rabbit</font>]] <font size="1">[http://vv.carleton.ca/~nhotson aka Nevin]</font> 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
 
: '''Yes''' This is another vote. --[[User:TheKillerRabbit|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="#0099CC">Killer</font> <font color="red">Rabbit</font>]] <font size="1">[http://vv.carleton.ca/~nhotson aka Nevin]</font> 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 15:22, 19 April 2010

I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--Foo1 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)

Yes This is another vote. --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--Foo1 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT)

Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT)

I think both Engineering and Environmental. The beauty of multiple categories ;)---BenzyneTalk Page 08:19, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.spacesim.org/index.php?title=Category_talk:Habitat_Systems&oldid=9239"