Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Habitat Systems"
From OCE Space Simulation
(Yes) |
(Got formatting wrong) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT) | I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
| − | : ''Yes'' This is another vote. --[[User:TheKillerRabbit|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="#0099CC">Killer</font> <font color="red">Rabbit</font>]] <font size="1">[http://vv.carleton.ca/~nhotson aka Nevin]</font> 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT) | + | : '''Yes''' This is another vote. --[[User:TheKillerRabbit|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="#0099CC">Killer</font> <font color="red">Rabbit</font>]] <font size="1">[http://vv.carleton.ca/~nhotson aka Nevin]</font> 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 13:58, 16 April 2006
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--Foo1 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
- Yes This is another vote. --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
