Difference between revisions of "Talk:Astronauts"
From OCE Space Simulation
(banter ;)) |
m (stupid keyboard...) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
well, it would be a nice addition if we had the time. Not a list of astronauts per see, but a list of all the staff throughout the years. A master list of sim membership [[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 22:48, 6 feb | well, it would be a nice addition if we had the time. Not a list of astronauts per see, but a list of all the staff throughout the years. A master list of sim membership [[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 22:48, 6 feb | ||
+ | :Back to this disscussiong about list of astros, even though there are list of astros on year pages, I think there should be a "List of Astros" page separate from this one, for listing all know astros by year, similar to the list of alumni.--[[User:Anthony|Anthony]] 11:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::If we do this, we'd also have to have a list of simulators and MC staff too. Is it worth the effort?---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 22:16, 19 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
==Current Astros== | ==Current Astros== | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
:Yes. He did, kind of, though I don't think we (me + Nevin) confirmed CAPCOM to anyone yet. Maybe you two should hold a proword-recalling-radio-procedure-knowing-and-radio-fixing-contest. | :Yes. He did, kind of, though I don't think we (me + Nevin) confirmed CAPCOM to anyone yet. Maybe you two should hold a proword-recalling-radio-procedure-knowing-and-radio-fixing-contest. | ||
::That's okay, general labour's fine for me. My job always gets stolen, like on the junior mission. Hee hee, you forgot to sign after your post:P---<font color="green">[[User:Rubberchickenben|Ben]]</font> 16:41, 3 February 2008 (EST) | ::That's okay, general labour's fine for me. My job always gets stolen, like on the junior mission. Hee hee, you forgot to sign after your post:P---<font color="green">[[User:Rubberchickenben|Ben]]</font> 16:41, 3 February 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Astronaut sans "s"== | ||
+ | I'm considering moving this to Astonaut. Objections?---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 13:38, 17 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
+ | :This page is about astronauts as a collective. I do prefer singulars, so I '''support''' this move, and request that the article be summarily rewritten to reflect the singular. [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 12:29, 22 March 2010 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 11:29, 22 March 2010
In my personal opinion, a list of astronauts is not a valuable thing to have. Especially considering that we have year by year lists in the entries for various years. What do you all think? Stefanido 17:52, 6 February 2006 (EST)
well, it would be a nice addition if we had the time. Not a list of astronauts per see, but a list of all the staff throughout the years. A master list of sim membership Foo1 22:48, 6 feb
- Back to this disscussiong about list of astros, even though there are list of astros on year pages, I think there should be a "List of Astros" page separate from this one, for listing all know astros by year, similar to the list of alumni.--Anthony 11:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
- If we do this, we'd also have to have a list of simulators and MC staff too. Is it worth the effort?---Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford 22:16, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
Current Astros
What, Andy stole my job? I was going to be Habcom.---Ben 14:54, 3 February 2008 (EST)
- Yes. He did, kind of, though I don't think we (me + Nevin) confirmed CAPCOM to anyone yet. Maybe you two should hold a proword-recalling-radio-procedure-knowing-and-radio-fixing-contest.
- That's okay, general labour's fine for me. My job always gets stolen, like on the junior mission. Hee hee, you forgot to sign after your post:P---Ben 16:41, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Astronaut sans "s"
I'm considering moving this to Astonaut. Objections?---BenzyneTalk Page 13:38, 17 March 2010 (EDT)
- This page is about astronauts as a collective. I do prefer singulars, so I support this move, and request that the article be summarily rewritten to reflect the singular. -- Stefanido 12:29, 22 March 2010 (EDT)