Difference between revisions of "Talk:SLINCE Drive"
From OCE Space Simulation
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we include this article?? I don;t think that the SLINCE drive exists anymore: at least not to my (limited) knowlage XP--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 22:09, 14 April 2006 (EDT) | Should we include this article?? I don;t think that the SLINCE drive exists anymore: at least not to my (limited) knowlage XP--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 22:09, 14 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Historically, the SLINCE drive was included as a backup system to appease [[Ross Green]], who was pushing for it to be the AYSE III drive. Back when we were desiging AYSE III, we had 4 main proposals. In the end, the SLINCE drive lost, but was then selected to be our "backup system" to send the habitat on a 1-way trip home. Your explanation of its operability is a bit off, and I can expand it if you want. This definitely falls into the pseudo-science category, and possibly also deserves a "Lore" flag. I personally have no issues with it being relegated to "lore" and to "no-longer-true/in-use", but that's your call. As for if it deserves an article, something should be written up, yes, but what spin you put on it is up to you. - [[User:Avacar|Avacar]] 16:46, 15 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: I actualy copy-pasted from the AYSE drive article XD --[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 17:11, 15 April 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 15 April 2006
Should we include this article?? I don;t think that the SLINCE drive exists anymore: at least not to my (limited) knowlage XP--Foo1 22:09, 14 April 2006 (EDT)
- Historically, the SLINCE drive was included as a backup system to appease Ross Green, who was pushing for it to be the AYSE III drive. Back when we were desiging AYSE III, we had 4 main proposals. In the end, the SLINCE drive lost, but was then selected to be our "backup system" to send the habitat on a 1-way trip home. Your explanation of its operability is a bit off, and I can expand it if you want. This definitely falls into the pseudo-science category, and possibly also deserves a "Lore" flag. I personally have no issues with it being relegated to "lore" and to "no-longer-true/in-use", but that's your call. As for if it deserves an article, something should be written up, yes, but what spin you put on it is up to you. - Avacar 16:46, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
- I actualy copy-pasted from the AYSE drive article XD --Foo1 17:11, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
