Difference between revisions of "Talk:Document Usage (procedures)"
m (Talk:Procedures Guide and Definitions moved to Talk:Document Usage (procedures): new ToC) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==[[TCS]]== | ==[[TCS]]== | ||
Do we use it? [[User:Stefanido|Stefanido]] 22:22, 2 March 2010 (EST) | Do we use it? [[User:Stefanido|Stefanido]] 22:22, 2 March 2010 (EST) | ||
| − | :Nope. [[IEST]] is the current pseduo-machine. ---[[user:Q-Cumber|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 11:59, 3 March 2010 (EST) | + | :Nope. [[Communications Systems|IEST]] is the current pseduo-machine. ---[[user:Q-Cumber|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 11:59, 3 March 2010 (EST) |
| + | |||
| + | ==Procedures Manual== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think we should tag the old procedures manual with an <nowiki>{{outdated}}</nowiki> tag and then put the new documents in a separate page. Then just change the linking. ---[[user:Q-Cumber|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 12:11, 3 March 2010 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:29, 20 April 2010
I made some major changes:
-updated CAPCOM procedures, although pending the new names for the systems
-distinguished between alpha and beta emergencies (the procedures for the 2 seem to be jumbled together)
-new fire and radiation procedures
I have finished segregating alpha and beta procedures. The procedure references need to be revamped, but I'm too lazy to do it now
Reasoning
Requesting additional documentation that includes reasoning behind specific procedures. For example, this could answer why we have PTC procedures in the first place. I will attempt this document, but we all know how large my attention span for large projects is. Stefanido 21:23, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
TCS
Do we use it? Stefanido 22:22, 2 March 2010 (EST)
Procedures Manual
I think we should tag the old procedures manual with an {{outdated}} tag and then put the new documents in a separate page. Then just change the linking. ---Q-Cumber 12:11, 3 March 2010 (EST)
