Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Habitat Systems"
From OCE Space Simulation
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**[[Engineering]] ([[Power Grid Software]]) | **[[Engineering]] ([[Power Grid Software]]) | ||
+ | Proposals: | ||
+ | ;Scientific equipment be removed from Habitat Systems. | ||
+ | :Rationale: Scientific Equipment is equipment and not a system. [[User:Stefanido|-- Stefanido]] 12:46, 12 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 12 April 2010
Project Status
Status: Work:
- See Category:Habitat Systems for list of articles under construction.
- Articles needing to be addressed
Proposals:
- Scientific equipment be removed from Habitat Systems.
- Rationale: Scientific Equipment is equipment and not a system. -- Stefanido 12:46, 12 April 2010 (EDT)
I think that all the habitat system articles should recieve the simulation label. It would make sense because everything in the habitat systems category is meant to explain the simulation; and pertains to the simulation only.--Foo1 21:38, 15 April 2006 (EDT)
- Yes This is another vote. --The Killer Rabbit aka Nevin 13:58, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
- How do we make it so the "environmental systems" link actualy leads to the environmental systems category page?--Foo1 23:13, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
Where would Inertial Dampeners/Artificial Gravity go? ---Wernstrum, Stargakat, Jonas 21:29, 30 March 2010 (EDT) I think both Engineering and Environmental. The beauty of multiple categories ;)---BenzyneTalk Page 08:19, 31 March 2010 (EDT)