Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Members"

Revision as of 20:53, 4 March 2010

TODO: Maybe shove the lists into tables with the columns "Member" and "Username" or something of the sort. Non-wiki-users can be listed as N/A. I don't know how to do that but I don't really like the cluttered look it has right now =/. ---Clayton

Corrected case of mistaken identity. - Darth Wombat 22:59, 29 January 2010 (EST)

I like the system of this page, if you edit the wiki you'll find this page and add your self - it sorts out the hard workers from the not so. IronyFail 18:00, 06 February 2010 (EST)

Alphabetization

Let's alphabetize them in each section. The sorting by links was a good idea, but may appear biased towards frequent wiki-users.---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 23:05, 18 February 2010 (EST)

Let me clarify that: alphabetical by last name ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 23:09, 18 February 2010 (EST)

Well done, good man. - Darth Wombat 23:50, 18 February 2010 (EST)

And user pages too! Now we just have to extrapolate beyond my time *digs through office archive* - also, did you notice that Maclean and Daisy each have three accounts? XD ---Benzyne^{Talk Page} 23:59, 18 February 2010 (EST)

Membership

Maybe at todays meeting you can clarify some of these members and make sure the right names are there / make sure they are still part of Sim. IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D! 10:58, 19 February 2010 (EST)

James Wood

I am going to add every name from James Wood's email. EVERY NAME. It will make this page massive, as it ought to be, but in preparation for this I am going to reverse the chronology, so that we are adding new members to the top rather than to the bottom. I don't mean to imply that newer members are more important than older members, but our organization on this page gets better as the years get higher and a much higher proportion of the newer members have member biographies and well-updated pages than the older members, and I don`t want someone to take one look at this page, see a massive line of redlinks, and leave.