Talk:Quality Scale - Revision history

Q-Cumber at 17:18, 14 October 2011

2011-10-14T17:18:21Z

Patrickpowns at 12:14, 14 October 2011

2011-10-14T12:14:36Z

Q-Cumber at 04:42, 14 October 2011

2011-10-14T04:42:35Z

Patrickpowns: /* Feedback Please */

2011-10-14T01:21:47Z

‎Feedback Please

Rubberchickenben at 18:31, 15 September 2010

2010-09-15T18:31:45Z

IronyFail at 00:49, 15 September 2010

2010-09-15T00:49:19Z

Rubberchickenben at 00:35, 15 September 2010

2010-09-15T00:35:28Z

IronyFail at 21:39, 14 September 2010

2010-09-14T21:39:32Z

Rubberchickenben at 19:14, 14 September 2010

2010-09-14T19:14:59Z

Rubberchickenben: New page: ==Feedback Please== I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopp...

2010-09-14T19:03:40Z

New page: ==Feedback Please== I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopp...

New page

==Feedback Please==
I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 14 October 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::::::What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)		:::::::What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
	::::::::Exist in the form of template:wip? or is there another template that I am painfully unaware of? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 08:14, 14 October 2011 (EDT)		::::::::Exist in the form of template:wip? or is there another template that I am painfully unaware of? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 08:14, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
		+	:::::::::See [[Template:meh\|<nowiki>{{meh}}</nowiki>]], [[Template:rubbish\|<nowiki>{{rubbish}}</nowiki>]], and [[Template:awesome\|<nowiki>{{awesome}}</nowiki>]]. They just haven't been implemented on a large scale yet :( >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 13:18, 14 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 14 October 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)		::::::So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)
	:::::::What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)		:::::::What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
		+	::::::::Exist in the form of template:wip? or is there another template that I am painfully unaware of? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 08:14, 14 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 14 October 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)		:::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
	::::::So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)		::::::So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)
		+	:::::::What do you mean? the templates exist. And in retrospect, there should be a "good" rank between meh and awesome >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 00:42, 14 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 14 October 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)		:::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
		+	::::::So just a template for this, i.e. template:meh would not really work in the intended way? [[User:Patrickpowns\|Patrickpowns]] 21:21, 13 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 15 September 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::"Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		:::"Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
	::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+	:::::Good point about the numerical idea. And people are lazy anyway :)---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 14:31, 15 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 15 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
	:::"Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		:::"Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+	::::No, It's to get your attention. anyways, I think it's a good idea, but I'm afraid people will just use these instead of editing pages, and eventually every page will be in a category, but people wil be to lazy to work on the pages. Also I dont think the numerical point system is needed, as every page that is rubbish is worth working on. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:49, 14 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:35, 15 September 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+	:::"Cool story, bro." does not constitute feedback. >.> ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:35, 14 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 14 September 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
	:Also, I know that the current templates only add the TALK PAGES to the categories; this way most people will not see the behind the scenes stuff. And it's so completely obvious which Talk page goes with which article; it would take an ardipithecus to screw that up. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:14, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		:Also, I know that the current templates only add the TALK PAGES to the categories; this way most people will not see the behind the scenes stuff. And it's so completely obvious which Talk page goes with which article; it would take an ardipithecus to screw that up. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:14, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Cool story, bro. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 17:39, 14 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 14 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Feedback Please==		==Feedback Please==
	I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		I'd like some comments on this. Yes, I haven't actually told anyone else about this before, and yes, it certainly falls out of my jurisdiction (not that that ever stopped Stefan lol), but this is definitely needed (rather than three or so different types of clean-up tags). A numerical priority system would be even better, ie. Rubbish 1-5, Meh 1-5, Awesome 1-5, with 1 being the highest priority. Thoughts? ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:03, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+	:Also, I know that the current templates only add the TALK PAGES to the categories; this way most people will not see the behind the scenes stuff. And it's so completely obvious which Talk page goes with which article; it would take an ardipithecus to screw that up. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:14, 14 September 2010 (EDT)