Talk:Ida and Dactyl 2003 - Revision history

Rubberchickenben at 21:11, 21 October 2008

2008-10-21T21:11:09Z

Anthony at 20:03, 21 October 2008

2008-10-21T20:03:50Z

Rubberchickenben: New page: I think this should be combined with 2002-03. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe th...

2008-10-21T19:55:36Z

New page: I think this should be combined with 2002-03. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe th...

New page

I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 21 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)		I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
	:Or someone should go find the information to fill in enough so that the pages contain different stuff >_>; I agree for the years that we generally know nothing about, the mission page should be merged into the year page, but the IDEAL set up still is that the mission page for the mission, the year page for the year, and both would contain significant amounts of information. Oh and by the way, how come there is no other ppl editing the wikis these days?--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 16:03, 21 October 2008 (EDT)		:Or someone should go find the information to fill in enough so that the pages contain different stuff >_>; I agree for the years that we generally know nothing about, the mission page should be merged into the year page, but the IDEAL set up still is that the mission page for the mission, the year page for the year, and both would contain significant amounts of information. Oh and by the way, how come there is no other ppl editing the wikis these days?--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 16:03, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
		+	::[[User:AeinSilverwolf\|Ian]] is working on an anime cosplay. Yes, incredibly lame. I yelled at him today, but he still is working on it. The rest of the people are, IDK, training maybe. Bryn is doing a lot of piloting, and I haven't talked to Clayton lately.
		+	::I agree about the exception of years where we know the details of the mission; unfortunately, that is not always the case. I will hopefully be able to add more details from the archive; the information I've found is wonderful. As you can see, I recently discovered some great data; as well, I have found a number of mission patches and compiled them in a file folder, which Bryn will then scan them from and give them to me for editing. Some of these patches are for years that are missing from the display of patches in the office, such as [[2001-02]] and [[2002-03]].---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 17:11, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 21 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)		I think this should be combined with [[2002-03]]. It's rather redundant having both, and as we do not know much about these missions, consolidating them is the best step. I also believe this should be done for other missions as well, as all the information within the mission articles is the same as that in the year articles. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford</font>]] 15:55, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
		+	:Or someone should go find the information to fill in enough so that the pages contain different stuff >_>; I agree for the years that we generally know nothing about, the mission page should be merged into the year page, but the IDEAL set up still is that the mission page for the mission, the year page for the year, and both would contain significant amounts of information. Oh and by the way, how come there is no other ppl editing the wikis these days?--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 16:03, 21 October 2008 (EDT)