Talk:INCO Procedures - Revision history

Stefanido at 17:47, 3 March 2010

2010-03-03T17:47:47Z

Stefanido: Forgot to sign comment...

2007-08-29T18:17:18Z

Forgot to sign comment...

Stefanido: What is INCO really?

2007-08-29T18:17:00Z

What is INCO really?

New page

==Out of Date?==
These procedures seem to be out of date from what I think of as Spacesim's INCO. Really, it seems like the job is a mix of EECOM, AUXCOM, CAPCOM, and Logs. Because EECOM takes care of all pressure changes in the vessel, EVA cabin-pressure management should be left to EECOM. Because the CAPCOM radio is plugged into the wall near the radio, CAPCOM should take care of the radio (this may necessitate having someone else control the video...). I think that INCO should be in charge of AUXCOM and Logs, and be the primary advisor to Flight on all matters procedural.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 3 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Out of Date?==		==Out of Date?==
	These procedures seem to be out of date from what I think of as Spacesim's INCO. Really, it seems like the job is a mix of EECOM, AUXCOM, CAPCOM, and Logs. Because EECOM takes care of all pressure changes in the vessel, EVA cabin-pressure management should be left to EECOM. Because the CAPCOM radio is plugged into the wall near the radio, CAPCOM should take care of the radio (this may necessitate having someone else control the video...). I think that INCO should be in charge of AUXCOM and Logs, and be the primary advisor to Flight on all matters procedural.[[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 14:17, 29 August 2007 (EDT)		These procedures seem to be out of date from what I think of as Spacesim's INCO. Really, it seems like the job is a mix of EECOM, AUXCOM, CAPCOM, and Logs. Because EECOM takes care of all pressure changes in the vessel, EVA cabin-pressure management should be left to EECOM. Because the CAPCOM radio is plugged into the wall near the radio, CAPCOM should take care of the radio (this may necessitate having someone else control the video...). I think that INCO should be in charge of AUXCOM and Logs, and be the primary advisor to Flight on all matters procedural.[[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 14:17, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
		+	:3 years and still no changes. I was going to suggest here that INCO be the station name for Engineering. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 12:47, 3 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 29 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Out of Date?==		==Out of Date?==
−	These procedures seem to be out of date from what I think of as Spacesim's INCO. Really, it seems like the job is a mix of EECOM, AUXCOM, CAPCOM, and Logs. Because EECOM takes care of all pressure changes in the vessel, EVA cabin-pressure management should be left to EECOM. Because the CAPCOM radio is plugged into the wall near the radio, CAPCOM should take care of the radio (this may necessitate having someone else control the video...). I think that INCO should be in charge of AUXCOM and Logs, and be the primary advisor to Flight on all matters procedural.	+	These procedures seem to be out of date from what I think of as Spacesim's INCO. Really, it seems like the job is a mix of EECOM, AUXCOM, CAPCOM, and Logs. Because EECOM takes care of all pressure changes in the vessel, EVA cabin-pressure management should be left to EECOM. Because the CAPCOM radio is plugged into the wall near the radio, CAPCOM should take care of the radio (this may necessitate having someone else control the video...). I think that INCO should be in charge of AUXCOM and Logs, and be the primary advisor to Flight on all matters procedural.[[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 14:17, 29 August 2007 (EDT)