Talk:Habitat - Revision history

Darth Wombat: /* Awesome Rating */

2010-09-21T02:00:12Z

‎Awesome Rating

2010-09-15T00:46:51Z

‎Awesome Rating

2010-09-15T00:34:30Z

2010-09-14T23:30:39Z

Because it is Awesome.

2010-04-09T19:53:14Z

2010-03-22T12:23:14Z

2010-03-22T02:46:53Z

2010-02-11T16:04:56Z

2010-02-10T01:14:08Z

Link Brahe to Hawking II subsection?

2006-04-17T02:18:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 21 September 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:Elaborate? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:46, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		:Elaborate? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:46, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Think about knowing nothing about spacesim, only having heard of the hab and maybe the planetarium. You go on the wiki, and naturally this is the first page you search up. Now read the first paragraph and decide whether you would want to continue. I wouldn't. - [[User:Darth Wombat\|Darth Wombat]] 22:00, 20 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 15 September 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	==Awesome Rating==		==Awesome Rating==
	I'm redacting the awesome rating, because even though the article is in-depth and the subject material is indeed awesome, it is organized absolutely HORRIBLY. There is so much material on that page that belongs elsewhere. That bloated article really needs to be streamlined. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:34, 14 September 2010 (EDT)		I'm redacting the awesome rating, because even though the article is in-depth and the subject material is indeed awesome, it is organized absolutely HORRIBLY. There is so much material on that page that belongs elsewhere. That bloated article really needs to be streamlined. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 20:34, 14 September 2010 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Elaborate? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in <font color="red">ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 20:46, 14 September 2010 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Organization==
 This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - [[User:Darth Wombat|Darth Wombat]] 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
@@ Line 17: / Line 15: @@
 ==Dissemination of Information==
 There is too much concentrated tangential information and not enough information about the Hab [[alpha]] and [[beta]] reality. Communication especially is overly represented. ---[[user:rubberchickenben|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:53, 9 April 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 14 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{Awesome}}
		+
	==Organization==		==Organization==
	This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - [[User:Darth Wombat\|Darth Wombat]] 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)		This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - [[User:Darth Wombat\|Darth Wombat]] 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 9 April 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)		Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	:Just Hab---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 11:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)		:Just Hab---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 11:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	==Dissemination of Information==
		+	There is too much concentrated tangential information and not enough information about the Hab [[alpha]] and [[beta]] reality. Communication especially is overly represented. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="red">RAEGMACHINE500]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:53, 9 April 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 22 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Organization==
		+	This page doesn't need to be added to so much as it needs to be reorganized. It's a large daunting wall of text, and only one sort of heading is used, which looks confusing and treats different sets equally (Rooms does not fit with the sequence Hawking I, Hawking II, Hawking III). - [[User:Darth Wombat\|Darth Wombat]] 22:46, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
		+
	== See main article Simulation: habitat ==		== See main article Simulation: habitat ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 11 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)		Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)
		+	:Just Hab---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 11:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 10 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::: No clue what that is...don;t bet on it XD--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 22:18, 16 April 2006 (EDT)		:::: No clue what that is...don;t bet on it XD--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 22:18, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	Shouldn't Brahe link to Hawking II subsection? Or is it fine just linking to Habitat? [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 20:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 17 April 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: No clue. I thought that it would be nice to have a seperate page for the habitat within the confines of the simulation :P--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 17:57, 16 April 2006 (EDT)		: No clue. I thought that it would be nice to have a seperate page for the habitat within the confines of the simulation :P--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 17:57, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
	::Have you created a Simulation: namespace? --[[User:TheKillerRabbit\|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="#0099CC">Killer</font> <font color="red">Rabbit</font>]] <font size="1">[http://vv.carleton.ca/~nhotson aka Nevin]</font> 18:45, 16 April 2006 (EDT)		::Have you created a Simulation: namespace? --[[User:TheKillerRabbit\|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="#0099CC">Killer</font> <font color="red">Rabbit</font>]] <font size="1">[http://vv.carleton.ca/~nhotson aka Nevin]</font> 18:45, 16 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	:::: No clue what that is...don;t bet on it XD--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 22:18, 16 April 2006 (EDT)