Talk:Engineering Commander - Revision history

Q-Cumber at 03:13, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T03:13:15Z

Stefanido at 18:13, 19 April 2010

2010-04-19T18:13:21Z

IronyFail: Thanks Stefan

2010-04-19T17:37:47Z

Thanks Stefan

Stefanido at 17:34, 19 April 2010

2010-04-19T17:34:31Z

IronyFail: Come on guys

2010-04-19T17:19:05Z

Come on guys

New page

This page seems as though it is making fun of the position instead of saying what it does. This should be changed so it actually has content rather then it just making fun of the position. [[User:IronyFail|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:19, 19 April 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 1 June 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
	:::No problem. This article still needs some clarification as to exactly what the Engineering Commander was responsible for and what prompted the position's creation. These are things that I do not know. [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 14:13, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		:::No problem. This article still needs some clarification as to exactly what the Engineering Commander was responsible for and what prompted the position's creation. These are things that I do not know. [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 14:13, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	The article still needs to explain that the Engineering Commander position existed and that Matt possessed it. It should not be solely a redirect to Tech Director. Take the EC section out of Tech Director and put it here. >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 23:13, 31 May 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 19 April 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Is this better? [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		:Is this better? [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
	::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
		+	:::No problem. This article still needs some clarification as to exactly what the Engineering Commander was responsible for and what prompted the position's creation. These are things that I do not know. [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 14:13, 19 April 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 19 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page seems as though it is making fun of the position instead of saying what it does. This should be changed so it actually has content rather then it just making fun of the position. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:19, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		This page seems as though it is making fun of the position instead of saying what it does. This should be changed so it actually has content rather then it just making fun of the position. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:19, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
	:Is this better? [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		:Is this better? [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
		+	::Much better, thank you. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:37, 19 April 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 19 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page seems as though it is making fun of the position instead of saying what it does. This should be changed so it actually has content rather then it just making fun of the position. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:19, 19 April 2010 (EDT)		This page seems as though it is making fun of the position instead of saying what it does. This should be changed so it actually has content rather then it just making fun of the position. [[User:IronyFail\|IronyFail in ANAGLYPH 3D!]] 13:19, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
		+	:Is this better? [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 13:34, 19 April 2010 (EDT)