Talk:Borrelly - Revision history

Q-Cumber at 22:15, 12 March 2010

2010-03-12T22:15:53Z

Stefanido at 17:15, 12 March 2010

2010-03-12T17:15:21Z

Anthony at 22:35, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T22:35:15Z

Q-Cumber at 22:29, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T22:29:30Z

Anthony at 22:26, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T22:26:27Z

Stefanido at 22:19, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T22:19:18Z

Anthony: New page: I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--~~~~

2010-03-10T22:14:56Z

New page: I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--~~~~

New page

I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--[[User:Anthony|Anthony]] 17:14, 10 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 12 March 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::Thats very interesting. So sim have taken to doing these sort of missions? Back in my day mini missions just referred to training missions (and just for fun missions), and we didn't run missions for outsiders, except for the fabled EEPs.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:35, 10 March 2010 (EST)		::::Thats very interesting. So sim have taken to doing these sort of missions? Back in my day mini missions just referred to training missions (and just for fun missions), and we didn't run missions for outsiders, except for the fabled EEPs.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:35, 10 March 2010 (EST)
	:::::That was also the case in my years. However, the terminology has been established, and makes sense. As for the place having been visited by many types of missions, the mission box in the template can be used to list more than one type (i.e. we can have both [[Main Mission]] and [[Training Mission]] in the box). Then the article proper will go into detail as to which missions actually went there, as opposed to Mission Type. This template is still young though, so feel free to suggest more changes. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 12:15, 12 March 2010 (EST)		:::::That was also the case in my years. However, the terminology has been established, and makes sense. As for the place having been visited by many types of missions, the mission box in the template can be used to list more than one type (i.e. we can have both [[Main Mission]] and [[Training Mission]] in the box). Then the article proper will go into detail as to which missions actually went there, as opposed to Mission Type. This template is still young though, so feel free to suggest more changes. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 12:15, 12 March 2010 (EST)
		+	::::::It's not that there have been any mini-missions, just that the term exists. I think the last mini-mission was [[Media Centre]]-era. ---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 17:15, 12 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 12 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 17:29, 10 March 2010 (EST)		:::---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 17:29, 10 March 2010 (EST)
	::::Thats very interesting. So sim have taken to doing these sort of missions? Back in my day mini missions just referred to training missions (and just for fun missions), and we didn't run missions for outsiders, except for the fabled EEPs.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:35, 10 March 2010 (EST)		::::Thats very interesting. So sim have taken to doing these sort of missions? Back in my day mini missions just referred to training missions (and just for fun missions), and we didn't run missions for outsiders, except for the fabled EEPs.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:35, 10 March 2010 (EST)
		+	:::::That was also the case in my years. However, the terminology has been established, and makes sense. As for the place having been visited by many types of missions, the mission box in the template can be used to list more than one type (i.e. we can have both [[Main Mission]] and [[Training Mission]] in the box). Then the article proper will go into detail as to which missions actually went there, as opposed to Mission Type. This template is still young though, so feel free to suggest more changes. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 12:15, 12 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 10 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::<blockquote>Commonly confused with the training mission, the mini-mission is a half-day to full-day simulated mission staffed by personnel who are not members of Spacesim. </blockquote>		:::<blockquote>Commonly confused with the training mission, the mini-mission is a half-day to full-day simulated mission staffed by personnel who are not members of Spacesim. </blockquote>
	:::---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 17:29, 10 March 2010 (EST)		:::---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 17:29, 10 March 2010 (EST)
		+	::::Thats very interesting. So sim have taken to doing these sort of missions? Back in my day mini missions just referred to training missions (and just for fun missions), and we didn't run missions for outsiders, except for the fabled EEPs.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:35, 10 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 10 March 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I like that, but it will get unwieldy for things such as the Moon, which had at least 5 missions visit it. I was planning on putting Main, Training, and Mini in the type box, and then having a "List of Missions by Type" in the article proper. -- [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 17:19, 10 March 2010 (EST)		:I like that, but it will get unwieldy for things such as the Moon, which had at least 5 missions visit it. I was planning on putting Main, Training, and Mini in the type box, and then having a "List of Missions by Type" in the article proper. -- [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 17:19, 10 March 2010 (EST)
	::I can see the problem, but how do you deal with the fact that some destinations have been visited by many types of missions? and the fact that there will be no direct way to determine which mission visited a given destination. I was thinking of dealing with the unweildiness by instead adding a section to the main text titled something like "List of Mission Visits". Oh, and there is a formal difference btw mini and training missions?--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:26, 10 March 2010 (EST)		::I can see the problem, but how do you deal with the fact that some destinations have been visited by many types of missions? and the fact that there will be no direct way to determine which mission visited a given destination. I was thinking of dealing with the unweildiness by instead adding a section to the main text titled something like "List of Mission Visits". Oh, and there is a formal difference btw mini and training missions?--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:26, 10 March 2010 (EST)
		+	:::From "[[Mini-mission]]":
		+	:::<blockquote>Commonly confused with the training mission, the mini-mission is a half-day to full-day simulated mission staffed by personnel who are not members of Spacesim. </blockquote>
		+	:::---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 17:29, 10 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 10 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:14, 10 March 2010 (EST)		I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:14, 10 March 2010 (EST)
	:I like that, but it will get unwieldy for things such as the Moon, which had at least 5 missions visit it. I was planning on putting Main, Training, and Mini in the type box, and then having a "List of Missions by Type" in the article proper. -- [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 17:19, 10 March 2010 (EST)		:I like that, but it will get unwieldy for things such as the Moon, which had at least 5 missions visit it. I was planning on putting Main, Training, and Mini in the type box, and then having a "List of Missions by Type" in the article proper. -- [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 17:19, 10 March 2010 (EST)
		+	::I can see the problem, but how do you deal with the fact that some destinations have been visited by many types of missions? and the fact that there will be no direct way to determine which mission visited a given destination. I was thinking of dealing with the unweildiness by instead adding a section to the main text titled something like "List of Mission Visits". Oh, and there is a formal difference btw mini and training missions?--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:26, 10 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 10 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:14, 10 March 2010 (EST)		I think that the link in "type of mission" would be better served it it linked to the specific mission that visited.--[[User:Anthony\|Anthony]] 17:14, 10 March 2010 (EST)
		+	:I like that, but it will get unwieldy for things such as the Moon, which had at least 5 missions visit it. I was planning on putting Main, Training, and Mini in the type box, and then having a "List of Missions by Type" in the article proper. -- [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 17:19, 10 March 2010 (EST)