Talk:Able Crewmen - Revision history

Q-Cumber at 21:37, 11 March 2010

2010-03-11T21:37:20Z

2010-03-11T21:34:39Z

FLIGHT

2010-02-04T20:54:18Z

2009-11-25T00:04:59Z

2006-04-11T14:15:17Z

Talk:Able Seamen moved to Talk:Able Crewmen

2006-04-07T15:49:31Z

2006-04-07T03:22:16Z

...I forgot to add my sig...damn forum habits...

2006-04-07T03:21:51Z

Foo! PAY ATTENTION!

2006-04-07T02:36:59Z

2006-04-07T02:36:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 11 March 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==FLIGHT==		==FLIGHT==
	Are we calling the piloting position on Hab FLIGHT? I'd prefer to reserve FLIGHT for the Flight Director in Mission Control. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 16:34, 11 March 2010 (EST)		Are we calling the piloting position on Hab FLIGHT? I'd prefer to reserve FLIGHT for the Flight Director in Mission Control. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 16:34, 11 March 2010 (EST)
		+	:Oh, okay. Just [[Pilot]]ing then? ---[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 16:37, 11 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 11 March 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==[[2009-10]] Crewmen==		==[[2009-10]] Crewmen==
	The fact that they have ranks SHOULD NOT BE NOTED IN AN ARTICLE ABOUT NOT HAVING RANKS---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:54, 4 February 2010 (EST)		The fact that they have ranks SHOULD NOT BE NOTED IN AN ARTICLE ABOUT NOT HAVING RANKS---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:54, 4 February 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	==FLIGHT==
		+	Are we calling the piloting position on Hab FLIGHT? I'd prefer to reserve FLIGHT for the Flight Director in Mission Control. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 16:34, 11 March 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 4 February 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I don't think past able crewman should be included, because if they were, it was noted on the mission page. Also, think of all the past missions with no data. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 19:04, 24 November 2009 (EST)		I don't think past able crewman should be included, because if they were, it was noted on the mission page. Also, think of all the past missions with no data. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 19:04, 24 November 2009 (EST)
		+	==[[2009-10]] Crewmen==
		+	The fact that they have ranks SHOULD NOT BE NOTED IN AN ARTICLE ABOUT NOT HAVING RANKS---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Benzyne]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 15:54, 4 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 25 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:May I ask why you're inventing terms? Are you trying to complicate things for new members? [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 11:49, 7 April 2006 (EDT)		:May I ask why you're inventing terms? Are you trying to complicate things for new members? [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 11:49, 7 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Noting Able Crewmen==
		+
		+	I don't think past able crewman should be included, because if they were, it was noted on the mission page. Also, think of all the past missions with no data. ---[[user:rubberchickenben\|<font color="green">Herr Doktor Tolkien von Oxford]][[User_talk:Rubberchickenben\|<sup>Talk Page</sup></font>]] 19:04, 24 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 7 April 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 23:22, 6 April 2006 (EDT)		::First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 23:22, 6 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	:May I ask why you're inventing terms? Are you trying to complicate things for new members? [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 11:49, 7 April 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:15, 11 April 2006
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 7 April 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there ----Alex Foo		:Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there ----Alex Foo

−	::First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this.	+	::First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 23:22, 6 April 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 7 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST)		I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST)

−	Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there...~~foo1~~	+	:Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there ----Alex Foo
		+
		+	::First off, Alex, INDENT YOUR POSTS so that we can actually read the posts in chronological order without getting screwed up (use a colon). Secondly, add your signature at the end of your post by putting four tildes in succesion. Thirdly, I don't agree that having a specific astro function be "does not appear to have a function" is a good idea, and I am sure that the current leadership as well as the past leadership will back me on this.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 7 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST)		I don't think that "Able Seaman" should be an actual position, as we should not be planning on having astronauts with no specific purpose. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 19:18, 1 April 2006 (EST)

−	Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there.	+	Well, Bfoo liked to call Nevin "able seamen" so I sorta took it from there...foo1