Talk:2012-13 - Revision history

Patrickpowns: /* Canadian Science Challenge */

2012-10-13T22:29:19Z

‎Canadian Science Challenge

Stefanido: CSC

2012-10-13T22:08:13Z

CSC

Patrickpowns at 21:50, 13 October 2012

2012-10-13T21:50:14Z

Patrickpowns: moon buggy taskforce

2012-10-13T21:49:39Z

moon buggy taskforce

Patrickpowns at 15:29, 26 July 2012

2012-07-26T15:29:52Z

Patrickpowns: new hierarchy template?

2012-07-26T15:29:22Z

new hierarchy template?

New page

== We still have directors of storage, training, and procedures? ==
I'm pretty sure those director positions are from the old hierarchy, should we just make another new template for this hierarchy, sans those positions?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 13 October 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Canadian Science Challenge==		==Canadian Science Challenge==
	Is anyone still interested in this? I think it'd be a great way to help generate experiments to run on the mission. [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 18:08, 13 October 2012 (EDT)		Is anyone still interested in this? I think it'd be a great way to help generate experiments to run on the mission. [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 18:08, 13 October 2012 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I'll bring this up with the dmagz, as well as the next meeting/worksession, but we're probably going to be doing weird science this year, we're having a main mission to a rogue planet (I'm putting that page up right now, [[Mersereau 2012 A]]), which will have some gravity on it. But nonetheless, this would be a good thing for the science taskforce

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 13 October 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Moon buggy taskforce==		==Moon buggy taskforce==
	So we're not going to do that one, we've got plenty on our plate, involving training all the new members, improving the hab, and UTDSC. It was mainly going to be a UTDSC replacement, but we're doing that now, so there. --[[User:Patrickpowns\|patrickpowns]] 17:50, 13 October 2012 (EDT)		So we're not going to do that one, we've got plenty on our plate, involving training all the new members, improving the hab, and UTDSC. It was mainly going to be a UTDSC replacement, but we're doing that now, so there. --[[User:Patrickpowns\|patrickpowns]] 17:50, 13 October 2012 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Canadian Science Challenge==
		+	Is anyone still interested in this? I think it'd be a great way to help generate experiments to run on the mission. [[User:Stefanido\|-- Stefanido]] 18:08, 13 October 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 13 October 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Moon buggy taskforce==		==Moon buggy taskforce==
−	So we're not going to do that one, we've got plenty on our plate, involving training all the new members, improving the hab, and UTDSC. It was mainly going to be a UTDSC replacement, but we're doing that now, so there.	+	So we're not going to do that one, we've got plenty on our plate, involving training all the new members, improving the hab, and UTDSC. It was mainly going to be a UTDSC replacement, but we're doing that now, so there. --[[User:Patrickpowns\|patrickpowns]] 17:50, 13 October 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 13 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== We still have directors of storage, training, and procedures? ==		== We still have directors of storage, training, and procedures? ==
	I'm pretty sure those director positions are from the old hierarchy, should we just make another new template for this hierarchy, sans those positions? ([[User:Patrickpowns\|patrickpowns]] 11:29, 26 July 2012 (EDT))		I'm pretty sure those director positions are from the old hierarchy, should we just make another new template for this hierarchy, sans those positions? ([[User:Patrickpowns\|patrickpowns]] 11:29, 26 July 2012 (EDT))
		+
		+	==Moon buggy taskforce==
		+	So we're not going to do that one, we've got plenty on our plate, involving training all the new members, improving the hab, and UTDSC. It was mainly going to be a UTDSC replacement, but we're doing that now, so there.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 26 July 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	== We still have directors of storage, training, and procedures? ==		== We still have directors of storage, training, and procedures? ==
−	I'm pretty sure those director positions are from the old hierarchy, should we just make another new template for this hierarchy, sans those positions?	+	I'm pretty sure those director positions are from the old hierarchy, should we just make another new template for this hierarchy, sans those positions? ([[User:Patrickpowns\|patrickpowns]] 11:29, 26 July 2012 (EDT))