Stefan's Proposal to Change the Hierarchy - Revision history

RyanTS at 23:03, 27 November 2015

2015-11-27T23:03:36Z

Rubberchickenben: i'm sorry, couldn't resist

2008-09-28T18:52:08Z

i'm sorry, couldn't resist

Stefanido: /* Ranks */

2007-05-11T01:18:19Z

‎Ranks

Stefanido: /* Commanders */

2007-05-11T01:17:22Z

‎Commanders

Stefanido: /* Warrant Officers */

2007-05-11T01:15:42Z

‎Warrant Officers

Stefanido: /* Ammendments */

2007-05-11T01:13:16Z

‎Ammendments

Stefanido: 1st Ammendment

2007-05-11T00:52:13Z

1st Ammendment

Stefanido: Fixed Picture Link

2007-05-10T03:57:36Z

Fixed Picture Link

Stefanido: /* Analysis of Possible Break-Downs in the System */ Fixed link

2007-05-10T01:11:21Z

‎Analysis of Possible Break-Downs in the System: Fixed link

TheKillerRabbit: Proposal to change the hierarchy moved to Stefan's Proposal to Change the Hierarchy

2007-05-10T00:04:43Z

Proposal to change the hierarchy moved to Stefan's Proposal to Change the Hierarchy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 27 November 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NPOV}}		{{NPOV}}

−	In early May [[2006-07\|2007]], [[Mission Commander]] [[Stefan De Young]] proposed a new hierarchy for the running of [[Spacesim]]. Essentially the system is an application of the [[~~Storey~~ Model]] integrated with other important hierarchichal factors such as [[List of Leadership Positions\|directors]].	+	In early May [[2006-07\|2007]], [[Mission Commander]] [[Stefan De Young]] proposed a new hierarchy for the running of [[Spacesim]]. Essentially the system is an application of the [[Evans Model]] integrated with other important hierarchichal factors such as [[List of Leadership Positions\|directors]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 28 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{NPOV}}
		+
	In early May [[2006-07\|2007]], [[Mission Commander]] [[Stefan De Young]] proposed a new hierarchy for the running of [[Spacesim]]. Essentially the system is an application of the [[Storey Model]] integrated with other important hierarchichal factors such as [[List of Leadership Positions\|directors]].		In early May [[2006-07\|2007]], [[Mission Commander]] [[Stefan De Young]] proposed a new hierarchy for the running of [[Spacesim]]. Essentially the system is an application of the [[Storey Model]] integrated with other important hierarchichal factors such as [[List of Leadership Positions\|directors]].

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 *The [First Ammendment] stipulates that either the Mission Commander or Sub Commander will be Astronaut Commander during the Mission.
 ====EEP Commander====
@@ Line 61: / Line 62: @@
 *The [Second Ammendment] gives the responsibilities of Spacesim's Public Relations to the EEP and Planetarium Commanders.
 ====Planetarium Commander====
@@ Line 67: / Line 69: @@
 The Lieutenant Commanders of Planetariums (P-Lt. Cmdr.) and Warrant Officer of Public Relations (WO-PR) are under the direct command of the Planetarium Commander.
 *The [Second Ammendment] gives the responsibilities of Spacesim's Public Relations to the EEP and Planetarium Commanders.
@@ Line 89: / Line 90: @@
 In an event where any commander is unable to fulfill his role, the sub-commander may act as an acting commander. Essentially, the sub-commander is someone who would be commander, but has been given other equally important responsibilities instead.
 ===Lieutenant Commanders===
@@ Line 129: / Line 132: @@
 Sergeants are appointed by the Sub-Commander, and any one person can not command more than one Task Force at a time. The Sub-Commander is responsible for finding recruits for each TF, but Sergeants may conscript members, if said members are not already involved in a project.
 ==Summary==

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 The Sub-Commander and Warrant Officer of Web-related Affairs (WO-W) (not to be confused with World of Warcraft) are under the direct command of the Mission Commander.
 ====EEP Commander====
@@ Line 58: / Line 60: @@
 The Lieutenant Commanders of EEPs (E-Lt. Cmdr.) and Warrant Officer of the Galileo Challenge (WO-GC) are under the direct command of the EEP Commander.
 ====Planetarium Commander====
@@ Line 65: / Line 68: @@
 The Lieutenant Commanders of Planetariums (P-Lt. Cmdr.) and Warrant Officer of Public Relations (WO-PR) are under the direct command of the Planetarium Commander.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 11 May 2007
Line 113:		Line 113:

	However, the plan proposed in this document will let each year’s commanders and sub-commander pick their own warrant officers, or cabinet, as it were. The Commanders themselves will still be chosen by their predecessors.		However, the plan proposed in this document will let each year’s commanders and sub-commander pick their own warrant officers, or cabinet, as it were. The Commanders themselves will still be chosen by their predecessors.
		+
		+	*The [Second Ammendment] modifies the responsibilities of the Warrant Officer of the Galileo Challenge, and abolishes the Warrant Officer of Public Relations, giving those responsibilies to the Commanders of EEP and Planetarium and the newly created Warrant Officer of Events.

	===Sergeants===		===Sergeants===

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 11 May 2007
Line 164:		Line 164:

	This ammendment proposed by [[Anthony Xing]] in [[2006-07\|2007]] dictates that the Mission Commander or Subcommander would be the Astronaut Commander during the [[Mission]].		This ammendment proposed by [[Anthony Xing]] in [[2006-07\|2007]] dictates that the Mission Commander or Subcommander would be the Astronaut Commander during the [[Mission]].
		+
		+	===2nd Ammendment===
		+
		+	<blockquote>The Warrant Officer of Events was formerly known as the Galileo Challenge director, but had its name changed due to added responsibilities. He or she is now responsible for the OCESS events that will be occuring at Lisgar. For the 2007-2008 year, these include: 1) Week of Hype, 2) Kepler Challenge, 3) Galileo Challenge, 4) Astronomy Week, 5) Assemblies, 6) Bake Sales. However, these will be run with significant assistance from and cooperation with the EEP Commander.</blockquote>
		+
		+	This ammendment was drafted by [[Jeffrey Gao]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 10 May 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Each officer will report to an officer of rank higher than theirs as indicated in Figure-1: The Hierarchy.		Each officer will report to an officer of rank higher than theirs as indicated in Figure-1: The Hierarchy.

−	[[Image:Hierarchy.~~jpg~~\|Hierarchy.~~jpg~~\|Tree diagram showing the hierarchy]]	+	[[Image:Hierarchy.JPG\|Hierarchy.JPG\|Tree diagram showing the hierarchy]]

@@ Line 139: / Line 139: @@
 ==Analysis of Possible Break-Downs in the System==
-As with most of the regimented ideology I have presented over my carreer as a Spacesim member, most notably the [[New Deal for Task Forces]], which I presented in [[2005-06]], in an attempt to create an analogous system to the Sub-Commander system presented in this document, there is the possibility that this idea will fall flat. Spacesim does not like changing its core organization, and is not receptive to new systems designed to increase efficiency by forcefully imposing order. Thus there is a medium probability that my suggestions presented here will not last a year. However, by starting a new year with this system in place, we reduce the chances of having the system totally overridden by the old philosophies.
+As with most of the regimented ideology I have presented over my carreer as a Spacesim member, most notably the [[Task Forces|New Deal for Task Forces]], which I presented in [[2005-06]], in an attempt to create an analogous system to the Sub-Commander system presented in this document, there is the possibility that this idea will fall flat. Spacesim does not like changing its core organization, and is not receptive to new systems designed to increase efficiency by forcefully imposing order. Thus there is a medium probability that my suggestions presented here will not last a year. However, by starting a new year with this system in place, we reduce the chances of having the system totally overridden by the old philosophies.
 Members may balk at having so many different ranks. They may feel that the system is too strict, and attempt to remove it. However, the reason that the leaders need order is that it is notoriously difficult to manage a club that doesn’t always listen to you. All members need to realize the value of following orders towards a common goal, but in exchange, Commanders need to actually know what they’re doing, and must be people that the general members do not mind following.

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:04, 10 May 2007
(No difference)